Про наших олимпийцев

ru_polit — 26.04.2018 Все уже забыли, да? А всё еще только начинается.

Решение спортивного арбитражного суда по Александру Легкову.

Само решение.
Сюда вытащу выводы (переводить не буду, яндекс вам в помощь). Если кратко, то Родченков в очередной раз обосрался, как и некоторые наши активные пользователи соо. CAS предлагает отменить санкции против спортсмена.

X. CONCLUSIONS
866. Having thoroughly considered the submissions of the Parties, the written evidence as well as the oral evidence and testimonies provided at the six-day hearing, the Panel, for the reasons set out above, finds that the Respondent has not discharged its burden of proving to the Panel’s comfortable satisfaction that the Appellant committed an ADRV during the Sochi Games. The Panel was unable to find the commission of either an ADRV in the form of the use of a prohibited substance, i.e. having used the Duchess Cocktail, under Article 2.2 of the WADC, or in the form of the use of a prohibited method, i.e. urine substitution, pursuant to Article 2.2 of the WADC in connection with M2.1 of the WADA 2014 Prohibited List, or an ADRV in the form of tampering in accordance with Article 2.5 of the WADC, or an ADRV in the form of cover-up of or complicity in an ADRV under Article 2.8 of the WADC.

867. In reaching these conclusions, the Panel wishes to underscore what it has not decided in this appeal. The Panel has not made a ruling on whether and to what extent the alleged doping scheme during the Sochi Games existed and how it operated even though it recognizes that there is significant evidence that it was in place and worked. Moreover, the Panel did not consider it possible to conclude that the existence of a general doping and cover-up scheme, even if established, would inexorably lead to a conclusion the Athlete committed the ADRVs alleged by the IOC.

868. What the Panel, in the appeal of an individual athlete against the finding of various ADRVs, did decide is simply this: for all of the reasons outlined in this award, the evidence presented before the Panel does not justify the conclusion to the comfortable satisfaction of the Panel that the Athlete, through acts or omissions, individually committed any of the alleged ADRVs.

869. Accordingly, the Panel concludes that the findings and sanctions imposed against the Appellant by the IOC DC in its appealed operative-part-only decision of 1 November 2017 and the reasoned decision of 27 November 2017 shall be set aside.

870. The Appellant’s individual results obtained during the Sochi Games shall be reinstated with all corresponding consequences concerning medals, medalist pins, and diploma reinstated. Similarly, the disqualification of the Russian team from the Men’s 4x10km Cross Country Skiing competition is aunulled with all corresponding consequences concerning medals, medalist pins, and diploma also reinstated.

Оставить комментарий

Популярные посты:

• Ранее
• Архив