So what?

yakov_a_jerkov — 23.01.2020

Reince Priebus: "Sometimes the best defense is the 'so-what' defense which is, if everything the Democrats said is true it's still not impeachable. If everything Lev Parnas said is true, it's still not impeachable" pic.twitter.com/hBMT3YvjqG

— Andrew Lawrence (@ndrew_lawrence) January 17, 2020

I look at this whole Ukrainegate. I say everything the Democrats have charged is true. I concede each and every allegation about trying to muscle the Ukrainian government into investigating the Bidens. I concede that. I concede that the call with Zelensky and President Trump was not appropriate. It was tacky and inappropriate. I concede all of that, and I come to “so what?” This does not state a case as demanded by Article 2, Section 4 of the Constitution of the United States. This is not bribery. This is not treason. This is not a high crime or misdemeanor. This entire impeachment fails because it does not state what the Constitution requires.

To illustrate how far the goalposts have shifted, here was Fox & Friends' Steve Doocy in September:

"If the president said, 'I will give you the money but you have got to investigate Joe Biden,' that is really off-the-rails wrong." pic.twitter.com/vz3rd4j1KC

— Parker Molloy (@ParkerMolloy) January 22, 2020

Оставить комментарий

Популярные посты:

uksibsan

Искусство системного подхода: стратегия и жизненные принципы Станислава Николаева

• Ранее
• Архив